Bunt mas i inne pisma socjologiczne. Front Cover. José Ortega y Gasset. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, – pages. Title, Bunt mas. Author, José Ortega y Gasset. Translated by, Piotr Niklewicz. Publisher, Muza, ISBN, , Length, pages. Title, Bunt mas. Author, José Ortega y Gasset. Publisher, Muza, ISBN, , Length, pages. Export Citation, BiBTeX.
|Published (Last):||5 January 2004|
|PDF File Size:||15.41 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Iberian Philosophy in European Philosophy categorize this paper. There’s a problem loading this menu at the moment.
José Ortega y Gasset – Wikipedia
Other styles in art should be considered in the context of dramatic social and political movements or deep religious krtega philosophical currents. Views Read Edit View history. History of liberalism Contributions to liberal theory. Ortega y Gasset had mws influence on writers of the Generation of ’27a group of poets that arose in Spanish literature in the s. Enter the email address you signed up with and we’ll email you a reset link.
Be the first to review this item Would you like to tell us about a lower price? Works of art connect people with one another and bind them in a common dialogue. Thus, the Spanish philosopher is close to the postmodern recognition of art as a free-and-easy intertextual game.
Skip to main content. Gasset – – Mad University Press. Related topics Democratic capitalism Liberal bias in academia.
Thus, metaphor was a formal means of meeting an artistic need to flee from reality in the first decades of the twentieth century. His statement is rooted in basic hermeneutical assumptions to the effect that conscious acceptance of transmissions of tradition and culture is necessary for one to understand the world, oneself and other people.
It is important here to emphasise along with Gadamer that this is a question of a real experience that transforms the interpreter. As a result, nonfigurative art appeared, making no attempt to respond to usual expectations of the image, and evoking shock and feelings of alienation from its viewers. As an eyewitness to the changes in art which took place at the beginning of the twentieth century, Ortega y Gasset was sure that art, on the threshold of that century, had been launched on a road from which there would be no turning back.
At the same time, there is still no answer to the question of whether the changes which have taken place in art have led to its rebirth in a completely new form or to a crisis.
José Ortega y Gasset
But could art on such a basis preserve any cognitive value? Gadamer, Prawda i metoda…, op.
On this issue, Gadamer remains more cautious, encouraging us only to respond to the appeal, addressed to everyone, to participate in the world of art. The viewer, for his part, had changed his attitude to contemporary art because it had departed radically from the artistic canons of the past.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number. According to the Spanish thinker, the crisis of the entire contemporary culture, and art in particular, was inextricably linked to the condition of European societies in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. The role of not only the modern audience, but also the entire set of critics and aestheticians, is to respond creatively to the challenges art poses us.
Help Center Find new research papers in: Traditional art, loaded with humanising elements, had been depleted, heavy, pathetic and serious.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we’ll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Ms audience immediately divides itself into two groups: The opening of the interpretative horizon of irtega took place along with its autonomisation, implemented by Immanuel Kant, and today the horizon seems to be continuously expanding. Retrieved from ” https: Ortega y Gasset, Dehumanizacja sztuki, in: In this sense Ortega y Gasset wrote that life is at the same time fate and freedom, and that freedom “is being free inside of a given fate.
Bunt mas i inne pisma socjologiczne
Introduction In undertaking an attempt at philosophical reflections on contemporary art today, it is impossible to ignore the changes that took place in human artistic activity in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries in Europe. An extremely difficult task lay before the artist: Delivery and Returns see our delivery rates and policies thinking of returning an ma
These considerations concerning contemporary art lead to the conclusion that neither philosopher has any doubt about art being an intellectual experience, expanding the cognitive horizon of the individual. Similarly, the true experience of art means taking a work as modern and up to date, and its truth as present. Democratic capitalism Liberal bias in academia.
Bunt mas – José Ortega y Gasset – Google Books
Credit offered by NewDay Ltd, over 18s only, subject to status. Ortega y Gasset seems to occupy the opposite pole; for him, art is frivolous, ironic game lacking a metaphysical dimension. In other projects Wikimedia Commons Wikiquote. Programmatically, it assumes a departure from the dead canons of the past and the elevation of man above his human dimension, detaching him from reality by means of its conscious deformation.
The meaning of the new art appeared, therefore, at the moment of recognition of the purely aesthetic value of the work. Gadamer thinks most seriously about human artistic activity, and thus comes near to the ancient approach to art, treating it on a jas with philosophy as one of the possible ways to reach the truth about reality.
Sign in Create an account.
We believe that comparison and analysis of these partly congruent, partly conflicting proposals may prove to be of cognitive value and to provide useful tools for the further study of contemporary art. Ortega y Gasset, Bunt mas [The revolt of the masses], in: