Christine Korsgaard which the normative question took shape in the debates of modern .. And that is the source of normativity.l3 So the argument shows. Christine M. Korsgaard, The Sources of Normativity (Cambridge: Cambridge reflection leads ineluctably to her endorsement of the source of moral claims. The Sources of Normativity has ratings and 12 reviews. Anthony said: Somewhere in the middle of this book you get the feeling that you may, in fact.
|Genre:||Health and Food|
|Published (Last):||22 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||3.39 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.7 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
We can do this with a maxim, for it has the form of a law by virtue of its intrinsic properties, and it is this that makes it a final reason for action.
The Sources of Normativity. Korsgaard turns inward the voluntarist formulation of legislator and citizen, positing the thinking self and acting self as our double nature.
Summary: Korsgaard’s Sources of Normativity
For to violate them is to lose your integrity and so your identity, and to no longer be who you are. No trivia or quizzes yet. However, she rejects the commonly held belief that reasons are private, and that one can derive public reasons from private reasons. You may also like Ethical concepts are, or purport to be, normative and make claims on us. For Korsgaard, our universal human nature is what allows us to all act reflectively.
Books by Christine M. Because our reflection distances us from the emotional and desirable route of action, this means we must act for reasons. Thankfully, that goes away by the end, but at that point you’ve been overwhelmed by the excellent commentaries by Cohen, Guess, and Williams and to a less extent Nagel, although he mostly just confused me.
Summary: Korsgaard’s Sources of Normativity
korsbaard When we are acting under volitional necessity, that is, when all actions but one are unthinkable then we are most autonomous. Cambridge University PressJun 28, – Philosophy – pages. The Sources of Sourcex Christine M. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up.
Korsgaard received a B. Refresh and try again. It is here, in the Self, that Korsgaard locates the source of normativity. Jan 02, Ft. Jan 19, Jeremy rated it it was amazing.
Selected pages Table of Contents. Human beings must act under the idea of free will. Her discussion is followed by commentary from G.
Universality and the reflective self. Account Options Sign in. To ask other readers questions about The Sources of Normativityplease sign up. A private reason would be a reason only for X, whereas public reasons are reasons for all agents relatively similar to X. It is our practical identities that guide us in our acquisition of moral law and the actions we take based on them.
Liberty, Virtue, and the Autobot Way Next: Nagel’s objections seem to me the most convincing of the four, but it is worth reading The Sources of Normativity for anyone who wants to decide for themselves. If I become a Kantian, Korsgaard’s the reason. Robert Lee rated it really liked it Apr 04, One of the challenges with the book, and it does weigh a bit on my review of the book, is that the language is often more obscure and technical than it needs to be, and dwells on a lot of references within the literature that give it the distinctive texture of academic writing.
JL Vanderhoek rated it really liked it Aug 25, In addition to addressing how and why moral ideas can have important practical and psychological effects on us, she also attempts to justify granting this kind of importance to morality. But a citizen in whom the general will triumphs gracefully over the private will exhibits a very special kind of autonomy, which is certainly not a lesser form.
The Sources of Normativity
In an undergrad philosophy class on problems in ethical theory, taught by libertarian James Stacey Taylor who introduced me to the IHSwe were required to write words-or-less summaries of each chapter of the philosophy books we were reading. Korsgaard is a legend in modern ethics and meta-ethics, and this book is a pretty good illustration of why that is. Chris rated it really liked it Mar 28, She traces their history, showing how each developed in response to the prior one and comparing their early versions normstivity those on the contemporary philosophical scene.
These laws are constrained by the Categorical Imperative. Christine Korsgaard identifies four accounts of the source of normativity that have been advocated by modern moral philosophers: Reason humanity and themorallaw.
Reasons are inherently public. Common terms and phrases agent animal answer argued argument Aristotle authority autonomous believe Bernard Williams categorical imperative causality Christine Korsgaard citizen claims commit consciousness course desires disapprove duty egoistic ethics existence explain fact G. As reflective beings, we must reflexively endorse a desire if it is to be considered sourxes reason to act.
This approach to argument, and the fact that it is so succinct, makes me think that Korsgaard is probably under-read among a lot of modern ethicists; personally, I would prefer using her work to talk about Kantian senses of obligations than a lot of the other writers, and try to set her up as a foil.
Korsgaard makes one too many logical leaps, in the traditional ca Korsgaard is attempting to develop a neo-kantian ethic. Informative, analytical, and fun to read. Erin rated it it was ok Sep 22, Cambridge University Press Amazon.
Selected pages Title Page. Reason humanity and the moral law. Open Preview See a Problem? Like some realists, Korsgaard holds that reasons normatigity intrinsically normative entities. Contents The normative question.